A major real estate controversy has surfaced in Gurgaon after police registered an FIR against six directors of two property firms over an alleged Rs 5 crore fraud linked to a commercial project in Sector 57.
The case, filed at Sector 56 police station, names directors of Ameya Commercial Projects and Anek Estates and Ventures LLP under Sections 420 (cheating) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.
Investment, Promises & Alleged Deception
The complainant, a resident of Sector 54, alleged that she invested Rs 5 crore in a commercial project — Ameya Sapphire 57 — after being assured of the developers’ credibility and timely delivery of possession.
According to the complaint, she purchased four units and paid the entire sale consideration. An agreement to sell, dated May 16, 2024, recorded that no further payment was due.
However, she alleged that although the agreement was executed by Ameya Commercial Projects, she was compelled to deposit the full amount into the bank account of Anek Estates and Ventures LLP, described as a “sister concern” of the developer. She claimed this was done deliberately to divert funds and avoid legal accountability.
Occupation Certificate Issued, But No Possession
As per the agreement, possession and execution of the sale deed were to take place within three months of receiving the Occupation Certificate (OC). The OC was granted on July 28, 2025.
Despite this, the complainant alleged that neither possession was handed over nor was the sale deed executed.
Threats & Mental Trauma Alleged
In her complaint, the investor further accused the directors of verbal abuse, humiliation, attempts to outrage her modesty and issuing threats when she demanded possession or a refund. She stated that she is living in fear and mental distress due to the alleged intimidation.
Investigation Underway
Police confirmed that no arrests have been made so far, but further action will follow after a detailed investigation.
Despite repeated attempts, the accused directors have not publicly responded to the allegations.
The case adds to growing concerns over accountability in the real estate sector, particularly in projects where buyers claim delays, fund diversion and non-delivery despite full payment.
